The Occlusion.esp is automatically ESL flagged for Skyrim Special Edition. Since DynDOLOD is just the advanced version of xLODGen for tree and object LOD generation, the code to generate the occlusion data and the results are the same. Generating the Occlusion.esp is fairly quick with quality 2 and it means not having additional plugins as master in DynDOLOD.
Skyrim se enbseries how to#
Please read the included documentation Skyrim-Occlusion-Readme.txt in the xLODGen archive and the TVDT - Occlusion Data section in Docs/DynDOLOD_Manual.html to learn about TVDT data, how to generate it and the settings.įor Skyrim, Skyrim VR and Skyim Special Edition I generally suggest to use DynDOLOD 3/xLODGen to create an Occlusion.esp for the entire load order.
Skyrim se enbseries update#
XLODGen beta (47 or newer) and DynDOLOD (2.70 or newer) can be used to update or generate TVDT Occlusion culling data on cell records, which is famously wrong for some cells in Tamriel causing rectangular holes in the distant LOD. But surely if I got higher FPS in my Skyrim benchmark it will translate somewhat to actual gameplay. Of course it's relatively old code now, but surely the game will respond to better hardware? Or maybe not, or too little to matter, depending on what's going on under the hood. The more interesting question is why Skyrim struggles when it does.
So yea, in terms of actual CPU performance of Haswell vs Skylake or Haswell vs Kaby Lake I'd have to totally disagree there. I want to try Kaby Lake with some DDR4 4000 to see how it goes. I get down to like 35 FPS in the mage place in the Imperial City because the CPU is way too slow. Skyrim for the most part runs fine for me but I want to minimize the worst 1% or allow myself to push for crazier things in Skyrim. (Then maybe 15%? 18%? 20%? For Kaby lake vs Haswell.) As far as CPU performance improvements go, that's pretty big. A 4.8ghz Skylake would be 6.66% higher clockspeed than a 4.5ghz Haswell, combine that with a 5% increase in IPC would be 11%+ difference. The PC building community and all of the review sites (along with my own Skyrim benchmarks) show that Skylake is faster. Haswell outpwerforming Skylake? The only time I've ever heard of people saying that is with sketchy Passmark data. The main benefit of the Haswell successors are the lower TDPs which I'm not concerned about. The minimal gains have yet to be worth the time and effort. I have yet to even have the need to apply an overclock to my K-version i5. As for my processor, the Haswell architecture has been shown to outperform it's successors in many applications. I'll likely remain on Windows 7 for at least until SSE is more fully supported by the modding community. Windows 7 support will completely end in 2020. I have no plans to move away from Windows 7 or Haswell for some time.
0 kommentar(er)
